The film's mishandling of story and character is perfectly illustrated in what is intended to be a key moment in the relationship on which the entire film is built. The exploration of the characters' relationships and motivations are lost in live-action translation under Condon's direction, resulting in a film that is somehow more rushed, yet longer than the original. While the films preceding the 2017 remake weren't direct remakes of Disney classics by being full-fledged reimaginings or spin-offs like Alice in Wonderland (2010) and Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast aimed to reiterate the same scenes and plot as the animated original with only minor changes thrown in to fill a longer runtime, setting the precedent for the regurgitative Aladdin and Mulan remakes that followed.Īlthough the remake is built on virtually the same script as the original, right down to the dialogue, it fails to capture the original's masterful pacing and focus on character. The 2017 live-action remake, directed by Bill Condon, served as a half-hearted, beat-for-beat emulation of the original and follows in the recent studio trend of translating favorite Disney toons into big-budget live-action adaptations. The animated best picture nominee revitalized Disney's fairy tale tradition of telling tales as old as time with memorable songs, lovable characters, and masterful animation, becoming an instant classic. Celebrating its 30th anniversary, Beauty and the Beastcaptivated audiences of all ages in classic Disney fashion and helped solidify the studio's animation renaissance of the 90's that began with The Little Mermaid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |